Abandoned animals found crammed in cages alongside road, North Carolina police say

auto insurance quotes - #1:Abandoned animals found crammed in cages alongside road, North Carolina police say

 

 Abandoned animals were found locked in cages on the side of a dark road in Western North Carolina, police said.
The animals were left off Dunsmore Avenue late Tuesday, March 1, or early Wednesday, March 2, the Black Mountain Police Department said in a Facebook post on Friday, March 4. Black Mountain is in Buncombe County, about 115 miles west of Charlotte.

The Facebook post had received more than 220 reactions and more than 70 comments as of Sunday, March 6.
“Thank you for saving them,” one person wrote on the post. “How cruel.”
“That’s so unbelievably mean,” another wrote.
Some Facebook users said they hope the animals find good homes — or that they want to adopt them themselves.
“So cruel. Glad they (were) found and praying for good homes,” one wrote.
Police didn’t provide information on the conditions of the animals or whether they would be available for adoption.

READ MORE - Abandoned animals found crammed in cages alongside road, North Carolina police say

Column: Spending $800,000 for a single unit of homeless housing is a red flag for L.A.

temporary car insurance - #1:Column: Spending $800,000 for a single unit of homeless housing is a red flag for L.A.

 

 Way back in 2016, when I voted for the $1.2-billion housing bond known as Proposition HHH, I expected a different picture than the one we’re looking at now.
We all knew it would be impossible to erect 10,000 units overnight and bring immediate relief to the city’s homeless multitudes. In fact, a 10-year timeline was laid out.
But HHH, sold as a centerpiece of the strategy to end homelessness, has underdelivered so far.

“It isn’t what Angelenos voted for six years ago,” said former city and county executive Miguel Santana, who cited multiple bureaucratic hurdles and worried that public frustration will make it difficult to win needed support for future investments in housing for homeless people.
More than five years after Mayor Eric Garcetti and other public officials celebrated victory, only 1,142 units have been completed, homelessness is on the rise, only about 8,000 of the promised 10,000 units are on the books, and the cost per unit of new housing keeps soaring, as do developer complaints about beastly permitting and inspection delays.
City Controller Ron Galperin’s latest audit of HHH progress, and lack thereof, reads like an indictment.
“While 54% of projects are currently in construction, nearly a third are still in pre-development,” Galperin found. “Projects in the primary HHH pipeline are taking three to six years to complete, with most set to open between 2023 and 2026.”
The average per-unit cost of projects under construction — originally estimated at $375,000 — went from $531,000 in 2020 to just shy of $600,000 last year.
As Galperin summed it up:
“The costs are too high and the pace is far too slow to address the tragedy on our streets.”
And then there’s this jaw-dropper:
“At least one project in pre-development is estimated to cost nearly $837,000 per unit.”
HHH got 77% approval, but if people knew how slowly the wheels would turn or that there’d come a day when a single unit would go for more than $800,000, it would have gotten buried.
For all of this, HHH was a good idea in theory, even if the execution has been less than sparkling. Los Angeles was and still is way short of the supportive and affordable housing it needs, and the 8,000 HHH units will end up housing 10,000 or more people who might otherwise languish or even die if left on the streets.
When it comes to high prices, L.A. is not alone. A Times report in 2020 put California at the top of the heap in the cost of government-subsidized housing complexes, and the story laid out details of a Solana Beach housing project that topped $1 million per unit.
In a written response to Galperin’s audit, L.A. Housing Department chief Ann Sewill scratched back.
She argued that tweaks suggested by Galperin have already been implemented, that HHH isn’t the only housing initiative, and that HHH progress has been “anything but sluggish." She also said that despite challenges and market forces, HHH “will over-perform on its goals.”
That’s a rosy assessment. Sewill also argued that the financing model involves the leveraging of funds, so that, say, only $140,833 of HHH money is needed to build a $659,600 unit because HHH leverages funding from multiple other government sources.

READ MORE - Column: Spending $800,000 for a single unit of homeless housing is a red flag for L.A.

Fox News defense reporter challenges war comments on air

car insurance companies - #1:Fox News defense reporter challenges war comments on air 

Fox News national security correspondent Jennifer Griffin couldn't hold back when following a retired U.S. Army colonel on the air recently, saying she barely had time to correct all of his “distortions.”
She tried, though. And it wasn’t for the first time or the last time.
Griffin, who has reported for Fox News Channel since 1996, has attracted attention over the past two weeks as she has publicly corrected or contradicted several Fox analysts and hosts on the air about the crisis in Ukraine. When Tucker Carlson suggested this week that some reporters are acting as flacks for the Pentagon, some interpreted that as a criticism of his colleague.

Meanwhile, former Fox host Bill O'Reilly singled Griffin out as a gutsy reporter unafraid to challenge others.
Griffin says her efforts are consistent with what she's always tried to do for 25 years, both on the air and behind the scenes at Fox News.
Related video: Tucker Carlson admits being wrong about Ukraine after supporting Russia

“I think you want your experts, in today's media environment, to be passionate about what they know and what they feel about the facts,” said Steve Krakauer, author of The Fourth Watch, a media newsletter with a conservative viewpoint. “I want them to be in the story.”
Griffin knows her beat as much as anyone in journalism and her real-time fact-checks are a valuable public service, as long as she doesn’t get caught in the muck of partisan debating, he said on Thursday.
Griffin has pushed back on comments made by Sean Hannity, Steve Doocy, Harris Faulkner and Greg Gutfeld during appearances on their own shows. After Hannity criticized President Joe Biden on Ukraine policy, Griffin noted that every president since the fall of the Soviet Union has made mistakes there. Doocy argued on “Fox & Friends” that sanctions haven’t worked against Russia; Griffin said it was too soon to say that. When Faulkner similarly questioned whether sanctions were a sufficient step, Griffin said that sending troops to the area would have given Putin an excuse to invade. She said it was “not some wag-the-dog situation” when Gutfeld suggested on “The Five” that the Ukraine crisis had been manufactured.
This past Sunday, she took on a retired U.S. Army brigadier general, Don Bolduc, after he said that it “boggles my mind” that the United States hadn’t already gone “all in” on Ukraine. Griffin said Bolduc was a politician, not a student of history.
“To suggest that the U.S. would put indirect fire or special operations or CIA on the ground to give Putin any sort of excuse to broaden this conflict is extremely dangerous talk at a time like this,” Griffin said.
Earlier that day, she was interviewed by Trey Gowdy after an appearance by retired U.S. Army Col. Doug Macgregor, who urged the United States to stay out of Ukraine and not ship it any weapons. He said the Russians should be allowed to annex the portion of Ukraine they are most interested in.
When Griffin followed him, she said she needed to correct some of what Macgregor had said, “and I'm not sure 10 minutes is enough time because there are so many distortions.” She said that Macgregor sounded like an apologist for Putin. "That kind of projection of withdrawal and weakness is what made Putin think he could move into a sovereign country,” she said.

READ MORE - Fox News defense reporter challenges war comments on air

Judge delivers blow to undercover FBI agents in Whitmer kidnap case

public liability insurance - #1:Judge delivers blow to undercover FBI agents in Whitmer kidnap case 

To this day, the defendants in the alleged plot to kidnap Gov. Gretchen Whitmer don't know who "Mark" and "Red" really are.
The two undercover FBI agents infiltrated their group, pretending to be one of them, but their real names have been kept secret.
Not for long.
Over the objections of the government, a judge ruled on Thursday that the two FBI agents will have to use their real names when they testify in the upcoming Whitmer kidnap trial.

While the case was largely built in secrecy, with undercover informants and agents spying on the accused, the judge stressed that the trial will be open and transparent.
"Making it crystal clear to the jury and the public that inside the courtroom, nothing is undercover and everything is out in the open will best ensure fairness during trial and eventual acceptance and respect for whatever the jury ultimately decides," Chief U.S. District Judge Robert Jonker wrote.
Under Jonker's ruling, the government will have to provide the names of the FBI witnesses to the defense one day before they testify.
According to court records, “Mark” posed as a resident of the Upper Peninsula, and was tasked by the defendants with — among other things — scouting out the governor’s summer home. The other undercover agent, “Red,” was introduced as a demolitions expert a few weeks before the suspects' 2020 arrests.
According to the government, the defendants had made several efforts to recruit independent bomb makers, and “Red” was offered to the group in that capacity to mitigate the likelihood of an actual bomb attack.
The judge's ruling is a blow to the government, whose case has come under fire over the alleged misbehavior of multiple FBI informants and agents, including two who have been kicked off the case.
More: Wife beater, liar, schemer: 3 FBI agents crucial in Whitmer kidnap case, defense lawyers say
More: Bad acts of 3 FBI agents will not be mentioned in Whitmer kidnap trial
In the case of "Mark" and "Red," the prosecution had asked permission for the two agents to use their pseudonyms during trial and to keep their real names from the defense. The agents are involved in other antiterrorism investigations, prosecutors argued, and disclosing their identities could hinder those investigations and jeopardize their safety.
But the defense argued the defendants have a right to confront their accusers and know who they are. Additionally, they argued, concealing their identities unfairly prevents the defense from performing thorough cross examinations.
The judge agreed.
"At this point in the case, the court believes the balance of interests tips decidedly in favor of openness," Jonker wrote. "It is time for all guise and pretense to end and for the prosecution to present the evidence in an open forum with witnesses testifying using their true identity."
Jonker noted he understood the government's concern over the safety of its agents, but it didn't warrant hiding their real names.
"With respect to risk to witness safety, the court is sympathetic," Jonker wrote, "but also cognizant that such risk is inherent in an investigation model that relies on undercover agents."

READ MORE - Judge delivers blow to undercover FBI agents in Whitmer kidnap case

Former Deputy Accused Of Raping 14-Year-Old Avoids Jail Time And Sex Offender Registry

geico car insurance - #1:Former Deputy Accused Of Raping 14-Year-Old Avoids Jail Time And Sex Offender Registry

 

 A former sheriff’s deputy in Tennessee who was accused of raping a 14-year-old girl over a period of nearly two years will avoid jail time after pleading guilty to a lesser charge.
Brian Beck, 47, was sentenced to three years probation after pleading guilty to a charge of aggravated assault, according to Memphis Fox 13. Beck, who had worked on the force with the Shelby County Sheriff’s Office since 2004, was initially charged with two counts of rape by force or coercion and two counts of sexual battery by an authority figure back in 2018.

According to court documents obtained by Law&Crime, the judge in the case suspended a four-year prison term in favor of probation. The State ordered Beck to have no contact with the victim or her family, be subject to random drug screenings, and serve 150 hours of community service. If Beck violates his probation, he faces the original sentence.
Beck also isn’t required to be part of the sex offender registry.

Brian Beck Photo: Shelby County Sheriff’s Office
“Considering all the facts, evidence, and circumstances, as well as all possible defenses that could be raised in trial, this settlement was made in the best interests of obtaining justice for the victim,” a spokesperson with the Shelby County District Attorney’s Office told Oxygen.com over email. “The defendant will have a felony on his record, and can no longer carry a gun or be in law enforcement.”
Beck was relieved from his duties without pay following the grand jury’s indictment in 2018.
Beck’s case faced delays due to the COVID-19 pandemic and a growing backlog of court cases, as previously reported by NBC affiliate Action 5 News.
“It’s five years,” the victim’s father told the Memphis outlet. “I mean, she needs closure.”
District Attorney Amy Weirich responded to claims that the parties involvedwere not granted their right to a fair and speedy trial, as afforded by the Sixth Amendment of the constitution.
“There’s a whole bunch of factors that go into getting any case ready for trial and in a posture of getting that trial off the ground,” Weirich generalized.
Still, families and advocates continued to voice their frustration, including the father of Beck’s victim, who wished to remain anonymous.
“I mean, there are damages, you know, major damages and unhappiness,” he said. “She just needs some closure. She just needs to see movement of the ball, that’s what she needs to see.”
The District Attorney’s Office said the recent plea deal would spare the victim from having to testify during the trial, according to CBS affiliate WREG 3.
For the original charges, Beck faced 30 years in prison for each of the two rape charges and 15 years for each sexual battery charge, per Tennessee law, for a total of 90 years behind bars. The legal age of consent in the state is 18 years old.
The Shelby County Sheriff’s Office and Beck’s legal representative did not immediately respond to requests from Oxygen.com.

READ MORE - Former Deputy Accused Of Raping 14-Year-Old Avoids Jail Time And Sex Offender Registry

A flurry of sex-abuse allegations is rocking a Long Island high school where 2 accusers say lines between teachers and students were blurred in a 'cult-like' environment

cheap car insurance quotes - #1:A flurry of sex-abuse allegations is rocking a Long Island high school where 2 accusers say lines between teachers and students were blurred in a 'cult-like' environment

 

 Long Island's Babylon Junior-Senior High School is in the grips of a sexual-abuse scandal.
Brittany Rohl's account of being groomed by a teacher ignited a cascade of similar allegations.
Rohl and another accuser told Insider about the "reckoning" ahead of an outpouring of allegations.
When the Babylon, New York, school district announced earlier this month that a high-school teacher had resigned amid unspecified allegations, Brittany Rohl thought of about six names that could fit the bill.
The district never detailed the allegations against the unidentified teacher, and the Suffolk County police on Long Island said they found no evidence of a crime. But the incident motivated Rohl, now 28, to speak out about her own experience with a different teacher at Babylon Junior-Senior High School.
"I felt like this was the time, if ever, to come forward," she told Insider in an interview Monday.
On November 8, Rohl wrote an eight-page letter to the Babylon Board of Education, alleging that a former teacher at the school groomed her from the age of 16 and initiated a two-year sexual relationship with her once she turned 18. The relationship left her feeling suicidal, she wrote in the letter.
Rohl told Insider she had always dreamed of a "reckoning" at her alma mater but didn't have "much hope that that would happen."
She said it was a "surreal" experience seeing just how wrong she was.
Rohl's letter prompted a wave of women to come forward with their own allegations against staff members at the school. Dozens told their stories in a dramatic six-hour school-board meeting on November 15.
Rohl told Insider she expected a few other women to show up and speak that day but was surprised when even more stepped up to the microphone. She said some even showed up during the meeting after watching it unfold on Zoom and deciding to get in their cars and drive there to speak.
"I really thought that no one would bat an eye about this" or would try to discredit her, Rohl said. "To see so many people show up to the meeting — the venue was moved from the library to the auditorium — and then I got a standing ovation at the end of my speech, it just felt like a dream come true."
One of the women who spoke was Darcy Bennet, who graduated in 2009. Bennet alleged that a former teacher at the school, who also coached the tennis team, had touched her inappropriately at a summer camp between her seventh- and eighth-grade years and then tried to kiss her when she was in the ninth grade and attending a different school. Bennet told Insider that when she later described these unwanted sexual advances to a Babylon guidance counselor, the man was relieved of his coaching duties but allowed to continue teaching. (The teacher did not return a request for comment.)
Neither Bennet nor Rohl pressed charges over their claims, which date back to the late aughts and early 2010s, and some evidence that might have corroborated them has most likely been lost over the past decade.
Rohl told Insider she spent a lot of the meeting crying as she heard Bennet and the other women's stories.

READ MORE - A flurry of sex-abuse allegations is rocking a Long Island high school where 2 accusers say lines between teachers and students were blurred in a 'cult-like' environment

An off-duty New Jersey officer and his mother were charged after he fatally struck a pedestrian with his car and took the body back to his house, officials say

auto insurance companies - #1:An off-duty New Jersey officer and his mother were charged after he fatally struck a pedestrian with his car and took the body back to his house, officials say 

A New Jersey officer has been charged with reckless vehicular homicide, Essex County officials said.
Louis Santiago took a pedestrian's body home after a collision. He then returned it to the scene.
Santiago's passenger and mother also face charges tied to the incident.
An off-duty New Jersey police officer has been charged with reckless vehicular homicide after fatally striking a pedestrian while driving, officials said.
Louis Santiago, 25, of the Newark Police Department, struck Damian Z. Dymka, 29, early in the morning on November 1 on the Garden State Parkway, said a release from the Essex County Prosecutor's Office issued on Wednesday.
The prosecutor's office said that after striking Dymka, Santiago fled the scene, only to return to put the body in his car and drive home, where he discussed the situation with his mother, Annette Santiago. A preliminary investigation found that Santiago failed to "maintain his lane and traveled on the right shoulder" of the parkway, where he hit Dymka.
Albert Guzman was a passenger in the car. And neither Santiago nor Guzman called 911 or administered aid, the prosecutor's office said in its statement.
The release also said that Santiago eventually returned the body to the scene, where it was found in the back seat by New Jersey State Police.
Santiago's father, a lieutenant in the Newark Police Department, was the one who called 911 to report that his son had been involved in an accident.
The release said that in addition to the charge of reckless vehicular homicide, Santiago was charged with leaving the scene of a crash resulting in death, desecrating human remains, and conspiracy to hinder prosecution, among other charges.
Santiago's mother and Guzman have been charged with conspiracy to desecrate human remains, hindering apprehension, and conspiracy to hinder apprehension and tamper with physical evidence.

READ MORE - An off-duty New Jersey officer and his mother were charged after he fatally struck a pedestrian with his car and took the body back to his house, officials say

Their own words may have doomed men who killed Ahmaud Arbery

cheapest insurance - #1:Their own words may have doomed men who killed Ahmaud Arbery 

The video of Ahmaud Arbery's shotgun death was a shocking piece of evidence that suddenly brought the Black man's killing into the national consciousness.
But the murder convictions of the three white men who chased him may have been secured as much by their own words to investigators the day of the shooting.
Greg McMichael, who was in the bed of a pickup truck when his son killed Arbery, told police the Black man "was trapped like a rat" and he told Arbery: "Stop, or I’ll blow your f—ing head off!”
Statements like that allowed prosecutors to give context to the short video that didn't show the entire shooting and had little of the five minutes that the men chased Arbery.
“It’s those statements that screwed the defense more than the video. If they had never talked to police and they said we saw him taking something from the property and running — there’s an OK shot the jury might have acquitted them," said appellate attorney Andrew Fleischman, who followed the trial from Atlanta.
WHAT THEY SAID:
The shooter, Travis McMichael, his dad, Greg McMichael and neighbor William “Roddie” Bryan all spoke extensively and candidly with Glynn County investigators just hours after Arbery was killed in their Brunswick, Georgia, neighborhood in February 2020.
They told police they weren’t sure exactly what Arbery had done wrong, which would later be a big blow to their defense that they were making a citizen's arrest.
Watch: Key moments from the murder trial for Ahmaud Arbery's death

The citizen's arrest law, largely repealed by lawmakers after Arbery's death, required a person to see or have immediate knowledge of a crime being committed or have reasonable suspicion that someone is fleeing a felony in order to justify a citizen’s arrest.
“I don’t think the guy has actually stolen anything out of there, or if he did it was early in the process. But he keeps going back over and over again to this damn house," Greg McMichael said, according to a transcript of the interview that Glynn County police Sgt. Roderic Nohilly read in court.
Bryan was on his front porch when he saw Arbery run past with the McMichaels’ truck close behind. He told police he didn’t recognize any of them, or know what prompted the chase, but still joined in after calling out: “Y’all got him?”
In an interview with the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, Bryan said he wanted to take a photo of Arbery to show police, but couldn’t point to any crimes Arbery had committed.
“I figured he had done something wrong,” Bryan said. “I didn’t know for sure.”
The statements allowed prosecutor Linda Dunikoski to methodically pick apart the defense's arguments.
“Nobody was talking about a citizen’s arrest. And I don’t mean using the magic words ‘citizen’s arrest.’ I mean no one’s saying, ‘We saw the guy commit a burglary and we were going to hold on to him so we could turn him over to police because he committed this crime,'" Atlanta defense attorney Page Pate said.
DEFENSE CASE
That left the attorneys for the men to struggle to explain away their statements.
“The evidence suggests that Roddie Bryan legitimately struggles to find the right words,” Bryan's lawyer, Kevin Gough, told jurors in his closing argument Monday.

READ MORE - Their own words may have doomed men who killed Ahmaud Arbery

Oakdale man returns home after crashing motorcycle in Modesto. Hours later, he was dead

affordable car insurance - #1:Oakdale man returns home after crashing motorcycle in Modesto. Hours later, he was dead

 

 An Oakdale man died at home Wednesday night, hours after crashing his motorcycle in Modesto and being ejected into a canal, the California Highway Patrol reported.
The collision happened about 6:50 p.m. on McGee Avenue south of Claribel Road, said CHP Modesto office spokesman Officer Tom Olsen. Joshua Corrigan, 42, was southbound on a straight stretch of McGee, riding his 2008 Yamaha.
As he entered a roughly 45-degree left bend in the road north of Rice Road, he was unable to negotiate the turn and fell, Olsen said. Corrigan was thrown from the cycle and landed in the empty irrigation canal that parallels McGee.
Corrigan was able to get himself out of the canal and call his father, who came to pick him up.
The men returned to a family home in Oakdale. At about 9:20, Olsen said, Corrigan’s family called 911 to report that he had been in a crash and now was unresponsive.
An ambulance crew and the CHP responded to the home, where Corrigan was pronounced dead.
The cause of his death has yet to be determined, Olsen said. Also unknown at this time is whether drugs or alcohol were factors in the crash, he said.

READ MORE - Oakdale man returns home after crashing motorcycle in Modesto. Hours later, he was dead

GoFundMe pulls page aimed at raising $5 million bail for Waukesha Christmas parade suspect

homeowners insurance - #1:GoFundMe pulls page aimed at raising $5 million bail for Waukesha Christmas parade suspect

 

 A GoFundMe page aimed at raising $5 million bail for the Wisconsin man accused of plowing his SUV through a Christmas parade in Waukesha has been pulled from the platform.
Darrell Brooks Jr. was charged with five counts of first-degree intentional homicide following the holiday event on Sunday. Five people were pronounced dead on the scene while a sixth victim, 8-year-old Jackson Sparks, died days later in an area hospital.
During a court appearance on Tuesday, Brooks was ordered held on $5 million bail — sparking swift backlash given prosecutors previously admitted Brooks was only able to rip through the parade route after being sprung on an “inappropriately low” bond.
At the time of the parade massacre, Brooks was out on $1,000 bail after he was arrested earlier this month for allegedly attempting to run over the mother of his child with his car.
According to screengrabs first shared by Law Enforcement Today, the bail also spawned a fundraising effort on Brooks’ behalf. Set up by a person going by the name James Norton, the page insisted Brooks was a victim of a “racist” justice system and used hashtags including #RacismIsReal and #BLM.
“On November 21st, 2021 our dear friend Darrell Brooks was arrested for allegedly driving his car into a parade, as someone who knows Darrell personally I can tell you that he would NEVER do such a thing and I know he is innocent of what he was charged with,” Norton wrote, per the screengrabs.
“Clearly there is more to the story the media is not telling us and I am seeking to raise the bail so Darrell can be released and speak his truth to his side of the story in this tragic situation that sees another black man behind bars in a purely political and racist trial.”
The fundraiser organizer went on to write that there is “no excuse for this continued treatment of black Americans by prosecutors around the country.”
A spokesperson for GoFundMe on Wednesday confirmed to Fox Business that the page has since been removed from the platform. The person attempting to raise money for Brooks has also been banned from using GoFundMe for future fundraisers.
“Fundraisers with misuse are very rare, and we take all complaints very seriously,” the spokesperson said.
“Our team works with law enforcement to report issues and assists them in any investigations they deem necessary.”
The move comes amid controversy for GoFundMe over its previous removal of pages dedicated to raising money for Kyle Rittenhouse, who was recently acquitted of killing two men and wounding a third with an AR-style semi-automatic rifle unrest in Wisconsin last summer. The late-night violence was triggered by the shooting of Jacob Blake, a 29-year-old Black man who was shot by a white police officer on Aug. 23, 2020.
Now that Rittenhouse has been cleared of all violent charges, a spokesperson said money could now be raised on his behalf through the platform.
“If someone is acquitted of those charges, as Rittenhouse was today, a fundraiser started subsequently for their legal defense and other expenses would not violate this policy,” according to GoFundMe.
“A fundraiser to pay lawyers, cover legal expenses or to help with ongoing living expenses for a person acquitted of those charges could remain active as long as we determine it is not in violation of any of our other terms and, for example, the purpose is clearly stated and the correct beneficiary is added to the fundraiser.”

READ MORE - GoFundMe pulls page aimed at raising $5 million bail for Waukesha Christmas parade suspect